Tradingurus.com The Social-Network for Traders and Investors
Your Ad Here
Contact UsOur MissionHow does it work?Register
Home
Opinions
Content Map
Stock Picks
Forum
Upgrades & Downgrades
Latest News
Technical HELP!!!!
Personal Blogs
Contributed Articles
Company Directory
Glossary
Links
Search
Subscribe with Bloglines
 Subscribe in a reader
page counter


Add to My Yahoo!
The Federal Home Loan Bank System: The Lender of Next-to-Last Resort?.

Adam B. Ashcraft, Morten L. Bech, and Scott Frame. The Federal Home Loan Bank System: The Lender of Next-to-Last Resort?. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports Staff Report Number...
+ Get the Full Story

Other Articles
Content Map News Latest

Search by tag : welcome, tradingurus, com, latest, expect, create


Disposable Personal Income Shows Disturbing Historical Trend

 

Written by G L, on 16-01-2008 22:56

Views : 1611    

Favoured : 20

Published in : The News, Latest News


The US has been in a worrisome trend for the past 30 years. Although disposable personal income has been growing (we are "richer" than our parents), the percentage at which disposable personal income grows year by year is smaller and smaller.

How do you measure personal wealth? As a standardized way to measure the wealth of individuals as part of a nation, it is the average disposable personal income. Disposable personal income, is the total after-tax income received by persons, or the income available to persons for spending or saving. By using this, it is easy to say if the population of a country is richer or poorer overall. Disposable personal income, however, does not measure how that wealth is distributed (if I ate two loaves of bread and you ate none, it will still show that we each ate one loaf), but that is not the subject of this post.

The US has been in a worrisome trend for the past 30 years. Although disposable personal income has been growing (we are "richer" than our parents), the percentage at which disposable personal income grows year by year is smaller and smaller. To provide an example, it is like driving a bicycle uphill. You will still go higher, but the amount of energy needed to advance gets higher as you climb. This example should make it clear that, if we don't change this trend, disposable personal income will stop growing and will start decreasing.

How steep is the hill that Americans are climbing up? Pretty steep indeed.

image

What this means to you, personally, is that, for instance, if your father was a factory worker in the 70s, and was able to put 3 or 4 kids through college, being the sole "earner" in the family, you may not be able to do the same even though you have a blue collar job.

Another way of understanding this trend is comparing it to the growth rate in humans. As you grow older, the growth rate decreases, then stales, and finally you enter a deterioration phase.

The data from 1930 to 2006 will help you see more clearly.

image

I do not believe there is any particular reason for the acceleration rate of disposable income growth to follow the same pattern as the human body. In other words, it is perfectly possible that we are able to change this trend.

The reasons of why this is going on are beyond the scope of this post, but the long term trend coincides with several societal trends. Whether it is because of the transformation from an industrial society to a financial/services society, or the increase in health care expenses after the health reform in the mid 1970s, or the retirement reform in the late 1970s, the truth is that between 1973 and 1982 the trend of the speed of wealth accumulation peaked.

By looking at the 10-year moving average, it could be argued that we may be at the bottom of a cycle, and that the acceleration of accumulation of wealth may be starting a new cycle.

image

Finally, another possible explanation is that the percent change from preceding period is only related to inflationary overheating of the economy, and it is not related to any social trends. If that is the case, the trend shows a neat 40-year inflationary cycle, which should peak somewhere around 2020. I personally never found a good explanation for inflationary cycles, so I do not have an opinion on the matter but these guys, interestingly enough, think the next peak may be in 2018.

Some times you don't have an answer, but you can come up with a good question.

Data from:

National Income and Product Accounts Table

Table 2.1. Personal Income and Its Disposition
[Billions of dollars]

Last Revised on November 29, 2007 Next Release Date December 20, 2007

See for yourself at http://www.bea.gov/national/nipaweb/TableView.asp#


Automation by TeachMeJoomla

Recommend this article...





Reddit!Del.icio.us!Facebook!Slashdot!Netscape!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!Furl!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!

Last update : 01-02-2008 09:39

Quote this article in website Favoured Print Send to friend Related articles Save this to del.icio.us

Users' Comments  RSS feed comment
 

Average user rating

   (0 vote)

 

Display 1 of 1 comments

1. 01-04-2008 08:45

Uh...
Hmmm. More proof that you can fit a curve to any old nonsense. Got my attention then completely lost my confidence with that graph showing the results extended back to the '30s. Not very convincing I'm afraid.
Guest
Jack

Display 1 of 1 comments

Add your comment



mXcomment 1.0.7 © 2007-2008 - visualclinic.fr
License Creative Commons - Some rights reserved
No Comments.
Discuss...
< Prev   Next >
At tradingurus.com you can create a blog, discuss on the forums, and even publish articles, and it is all free for non-commercial users!!! Create your free account and enjoy all of our features free for life.

 
Your Ad Here
© 2008 Tradingurus.com
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License. JoomSEF SEO by Artio (http://www.artio.net) - databases, information system and web applications
The news, comments and other copyrighted content are exclusive property of their respective owners. www.tradingurus.com is not affiliated with Reuters, AP or Yahoo News, Google News, or any other publisher whose articles are appear on the Web Site. The news are aggregated by www.tradingurus.com with no claim of Copyright. All trademarks and registered trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Not Legal Nor Financial Advice. www.tradingurus.com does not provide legal or financial advice, the opinions of the articles linked to these pages are those of the authors. All viewpoints expressed by the authors are those of the original author and do not in any way indicate those of www.tradingurus.com.
We do not endorse and are not held responsible for claims made by authors in their individual articles. The accuracy, completeness, adequacy or currency of the Content is not warranted or guaranteed. Your use of information on the Web site, or other materials linked to the Web site is at your own risk.
The columns, articles, and any other features provided on www.tradingurus.com are provided for personal finance and investment information and are not to be construed as investment advice. The views and opinions expressed in an article or column are the author’s own and not necessarily those of www.tradingurus.com and there is no implied endorsement by www.tradingurus.com of any advice or financial strategy.
The information at www.tradingurus.com is NOT a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell any securities.